My first thought as I started reading this book was “No duh.” I got the feeling throughout that the book was written not for parents starting with a clean slate, but rather for (ineffective) parents dealing with specific issues with their children.
Some examples of the “common sense” tips include sticking to rules that have been set and removing misbehaving children from the store/restaurant/mall when they don’t listen.
Overall it wasn’t a bad read, so here’s the Good and Bad breakdown.
The Good
1. Putting yourself first sets a good example and will teach your children to put themselves first in life. Allowing your world to revolve around your kids will teach them to let others’ feelings come before their own. Not a good recipe for dealing with relationships and work dynamics later in life.
2. Don’t expect your kids to do what you don’t. If you don’t wash the dishes and make your bed on a regular basis, it’s ridiculous to expect your kids to do the same.
3. Always give kids two choices that are both acceptable to you. If they don’t choose one, choose for them. Examples include “Would you like to sit here and eat nicely, or would you like to play on the floor instead?” and “Would you like to wear your coat or carry it?” Personally, I’ve found the choice method works extremely well with my 4 year old niece.
4. For older kids, let the universe deliver consequences. If a child refuses to do his homework, let him worry about what the teacher says, and enforce any repercussions that come from the teacher and school. Letting the universe do the teaching means the parent isn’t always the bad guy, and it helps teach children to respect authority. Again, parents have to walk the walk. This means no calling in sick to work when you’re not really sick, etc.
5. The author no longer endorses spanking. The first edition of the book did, but after further research he has determined it’s ineffective.
6. Don’t force kids to attend church. Most kids like Sunday School when they’re younger, but it’s natural for them to lose interest in church when they’re older. This is likely due to boredom with the materials delivered (how many times do we need to hear the Baby Moses story?) and rebellion against the parents. Continue to present church as an option, set the example as a parent, “I really enjoy my Sunday morning time with God”, and let it go. Most kids will come back around. If not, find out what’s really going on - are there conflict issues, etc? Personally, my kids will be allowed to explore religion if they’d like, but we sure won’t be making Sunday morning trips.
The Bad
1. The author promises his techniques will work 100% of the time, and if not, it’s because the parent is doing them wrong. This is a cop-out.
2. Following the book’s guidelines, children aren’t allowed to wake their parents in the middle of the night if they’re scared. Parents are also instructed not to check under beds or in closets for monsters.
3. And finally, the Love and Logic method has one fatal flaw. It relies very heavily on using the next meal as leverage. Throughout the book, the author insists we let our kids go hungry if they’ve wasted their lunch money, slept too late for breakfast, or forgot to mow the lawn in time. In one case, a boy wasted his week’s worth of lunch money at a carnival and so did not eat lunch for an entire school week. He was given hearty breakfasts and dinners, but still. Teaching our kids to reward or punish themselves with food is a recipe for disaster – with obesity and eating disorders both on the rise, this is no way to handle discipline. I challenge Dr. Foster to rewrite the book without using meals as leverage (and I imagine he would have an extremely difficult time.)
So there you have it. If anyone wants to borrow the book, let me know.





